User talk:Garboge6969

Useful links

Welcome! If you decide to stay and contribute, here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
The bold, revert, discuss way we normally operate in collaboration to reach consensus.
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Simple set of "cheats" that work in the source editor to create various text effects

If you have further questions, the Teahouse is a good place to ask, or you can add to the thread you started on my Talk Page. Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:13, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting self-block

See WP:SELFBLOCK and User:Beeblebrox/Self-blocking requirements (presumably Beeblebrox's requirements). Rather short editing history to request a block? Hope you feel better! Try wp:EUI or other humor? I sort of which I could get blocked from reading Wikipedia, or preferably, politics. Best wishes Adakiko (talk) 11:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New message to Garboge6969

"i don't like edit wars"—no one does! That's beside the fact that it's not acceptable for you to unilaterally make inadequately explained edits to articles without establishing consensus. If I can be frank, if your reaction each time your bold edits are reverted or questioned is as with previous instances, you're going to have serious problems collaborating with others on here. Communication and consensus is how we operate. Remsense ‥ 论 01:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, I'm MarkH21. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Napoleon III that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It's unacceptable to call other editors "bastard" or "idiot". — MarkH₂₁^talk 23:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Get slammed conservative bitch Garboge6969 (talk) 23:33, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. — MarkH₂₁^talk 23:40, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZmqhQ8myGY Garboge6969 (talk) 19:47, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — MarkH₂₁^talk 20:07, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did i get blocked Garboge6969 (talk) 20:12, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks and combative editing style.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:15, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting misconduct to every single wikipedia mod ever

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Garboge6969 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello wikipedia mods, I like to request a serious misconduct order to all of you great dodos (not an insult this time, I like calling higher-ups "dodos" because they are higher-ups and I hate them) 1. Pedophilia accusation: A mod (MarkH21) with bad intent called me a bisexual nothingfucker when I'm 15 years old. Did you know that assuming a minor's gender is pedophilia? Bad job, Mark. 2. The actual point. They call me out for personal attacks, why are personal attacks a blockable offense? It's unfair for your freeedom of speech to be marginalized just because you named someone "bastard" and "idiot" for rightfully starting edit wars with you. If anything, deleting my account INDEFINETLY ironically make you the personal attacker instead. Believe me when I say this, when I become the US president we will put in jail stupid motherfuckers like you. Mandeer! Oh eyah, Remsense should be the one blocked for starting edit wars. Ok for real this time, Mandeer! Wait, I'm not odne yet.... 3. Without any fucking DISCUSSION they straight up ban me. No talk, just straight up block. According to Remsense, WIkipedia is built in collaboration and communication. Aren't you contradicting yourself? Mandeer! Oh yeah, 4. Falsely accusing me of not being here to build an ecyclopedia. I'm not a fucking bully. Remsense was the one that started the bullshit. He should b eblocked for disrupting my edits. The reason I came here was to make alt history scenarios in my sandbox, and the VERY FIRST EDIT IN HERE TO AN ENCYCLOPEDIA ARTICLE was to remove vandalism. What the fuck is this? You should be in jail fr. mandeer! There is a lot more to uncover about your lies so i'm going to tell you next time bitches Garboge6969 (talk) 20:52, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not a block appeal. It is a rant. Your talk page access has been revoked. Plesse read WP:UTRS for your options.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just for the record: there is no such thing as a 'mod' on Wikipedia, and none of the 'mods' you refer to are admins. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:34, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also for the record, this site isn't a tool for your own projects like creating alt histories. Largoplazo (talk) 21:21, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]